The databases have been developed to summarize available scientific literature to demonstrate efficacy of various interventions and/or antimicrobials at a range of applicable concentrations for fresh and processed meat and poultry. They may be used to identify scientific support for HACCP Systems Validation by small and very small establishments.

The database is searchable via the drop-down menu, the type-in search bar or both. Use the category drop-down menu to select specific interests or type in key words in the search bar, or use both to narrow down search results.

Pork

Reference Product Type of Meat Microorganism Tested Process / Intervention Pathogen Effect Operational Parameters Critical Operational Parameters Comments
Arya, R., M. Bryant, H. L. Degala, A. K. Mahapatra, G. Kannan. 2018. Effectiveness of a low-cost household electrolyzed water generator in reducing the populations of Escherichia coli K12 on inoculated beef, chevon, and pork surfaces. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.13636 Beef pieces (retail source)
Pork pieces (retail source)
Goat pieces, boneless
Chilled Beef
Pork
Goat (chevon)
E. coli O157:H7 surrogate (i) acidic electrolyzed water
(ii) alkaline electrolyzed water
Bactericidal Time: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 minutes
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): subprimals (presumed; not explicitly stated)
Time: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 minutes Generally, acidic electrolyzed water was more effective than the alkaline treatment in producing surrogate reductions on products from all three species.
A reduction of 0.96-log or greater was seen for all species with acidic application times of 4 minutes and above. For alkaline treatments, reductions of 0.91-log or greater was seen across species with application times 8 minutes and greater, with one exception (chevon at 10 min).
Koch, F., C. Wiacek, and P. G. Braun. 2019. Pulsed light treatment for the reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium and
Yersinia enterocolitica on pork skin and pork loin. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 292: 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.11.014
Pork skin
Pork loin
Pork Salmonella Typhimurium
Yersinia enterocolitica
Pulsed light Bactericidal Time: see "Other" below
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: 1.27 J/cm2 per pulse at a distance of 1.93 cm from the quartz window. Pulse frequency was set to four
pulses in the first second and three pulses in every additional second with a pulse length of 300 μs. The wavelengths emitted by the Xenon flash lamp ranged from 200 to 1100 nm.
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): pulsed light
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): subprimals and skin
Equipment specs: SteriPulse-XL 3000, Model RS-3000C, Xenon Corporation, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA).
Other: Distances: 8.3 cm, 10.8 cm and 13.4 cm each tested at times of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 s corresponding to fluences between 0.52 and 19.11 J/cm^2 for Salmonella and Yersinia, respectively
Equipment Settings: 1.27 J/cm2 per pulse at a distance of 1.93 cm from the quartz window. Pulse frequency was set to four pulses in the first second and three pulses in every additional second with a pulse length of 300 μs. The wavelengths emitted by the Xenon flash lamp ranged from 200 to 1100 nm.
Other: Distances: 8.3 cm, 10.8 cm and 13.4 cm each tested at times of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 s corresponding to fluences between 0.52 and 19.11 J/cm^2 for Salmonella and Yersinia, respectively
Authors' summary of findings:
Reductions on pork skin ranged from 1.73 to 3.16 log for Salmonella and from 1.48 to 4.37 log for Yersinia.
Microbial reduction was significantly lower on pork loin, varying between a minimum of 0.4 and a maximum of 1.7 log for both pathogens
Yeh, Y., P. Purushothaman, N. Gupta, M. Ragnone, S. C> Verma, and A. S. de Mello. 2017. Bacteriophage application on red meats and poultry: Effects on Salmonella population in final ground products. Meat Science. 127:30-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.01.001 Beef trimmings
Pork trimmings
Chicken thighs
Turkey thighs
Chilled Beef
Pork
Chicken
Turkey
Salmonella Bacteriophage application Bactericidal Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 10^7 to 10^8 PFU/mL
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Pipetted while products were tumbled at 4 rpm for 2min
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): trimmings (beef and pork) or thighs (chicken and turkey)
Concentration: 10^7 to 10^8 PFU/mL Overall, bacteriophage application on trim reduced 1 and 0.8 log CFU/g of Salmonella in ground beef and ground pork, respectively.
For ground chicken and ground turkey, Salmonella was reduced by 1.1 and 0.9 log CFU/g, respectively
Rahman, S., J. Wang, and D. Oh. 2013. Synergistic effect of low concentration electrolyzed water and calcium lactate to ensure microbial safety, shelf life and sensory quality of fresh pork. Food Control 30: 176-183. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.041 Subprimals Pork Escherichia coli O157:H7 (B0259, B0297, B0299)
Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19115, ATTC 19111, and Scott A)
(i) Aqueous ozone dip
(ii) Lactic Acid dip
(iii) Calcium lactate dip
(iv) Sodium hypochlorite dip
(v) Low concentration electrolyzed water dip
(vi) Strong acidic electrolyzed water dip
(vii) Combination of Low concentration electrolyzed water and calcium lactate dip
Bactericidal (i) Aqueous Ozone
Time: 5 min
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application: Subprimals

(ii) Lactic Acid
Time: 5 min
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 3%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application: Subprimals

(iii) Calcium Lactate
Time: 5 min
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 3%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application: Subprimals

(iv) Sodium Hypochlorite
Time: 5 min
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application: Subprimals

(v) Low Concentration Electrolyzed Water
Time: 5 min
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application: Subprimals

(vi) Strong Acidic Electrolyzed Water
Time: 5 min
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application: Subprimals

(vii) Combination of Low Concentration Electrolyzed Water and Calcium Lactate
Time: 5 min
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application: Subprimals
(i) Aqueous Ozone
Time: 5 min

(ii) Lactic Acid
Time: 5 min
Concentration: 3%

(iii) Calcium Lactate
Time: 5 min
Concentration: 3%

(iv) Sodium Hypochlorite
Time: 5 min

(v) Low Concentration Electrolyzed Water
Time: 5 min

(vi) Strong Acidic Electrolyzed Water
Time: 5 min

(vii) Combination of Low Concentration Electrolyzed Water and Calcium Lactate
Time: 5 min
The combination of low concentration electrolyzed water and calcium lactate dip showed the greatest reduction of L. monocytogenes and E. coli
Castelo, M., D. Kang, G. Siragusa, M. Koohmaraie, and E. Berry. 2001. Evaluation of combination treatment processes for the microbial decontamination of pork trim. Journal of Food Protection 64: 335-342.  Trimmings Pork Aerobic bacteria
Coliforms
Escherichia coli (Generic)
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB)
(i) water wash
(ii) water wash followed by lactic acid spray
(iii) water wash followed by hot (65.5°C, 15 s) water followed by hot (510°C, 60 s) air followed by lactic acid spray
(iv) water wash followed by hot (82.2°C, 15 s) water followed by hot (510°C, 75 s) air followed by lactic acid spray
(v) water wash followed by hot (82.2°C, 45 s) water followed by hot (510°C, 90 s) air followed by lactic acid spray
(vii) trim followed by hot water spray, (viii) trim followed by lactic acid spray
(ix) trim followed by hot water spray followed by lactic acid spray
(x) trim followed by lactic acid spray followed by hot water spray
Bactericidal (i) Water Wash
Time: 15-180 s
Temperature: 15°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: 65 PSI (448.16 kPa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Wash
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Trim

(ii) Lactic Acid Spray
Time: 15-120 s
Temperature: 15°C
Concentration: 2%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: 35 PSI (241.32 kPa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Trim

(iii) Hot Water Spray (three options, denoted by a, b, and c)
Time: 15-45s
Temperature: (a) 65.5°C, (b) 71°C, (c) 82.2°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: 35 PSI (241.32 kPa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): trim

(iv) Hot air (three options, denoted by a, b, c)
Time: 15-90s
Temperature: (a) 454.4°C, (b) 482.2°C, (c) 510°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): NE
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): trim
(i) Water Wash
Time: 15-180 s
Temperature: 15°C
Pressure Delivery: 65 PSI (448.16kPa)

(ii) Lactic Acid Spray
Time: 15-120 s
Temperature: 15°C
Concentration: 2%
Pressure Delivery: 35 PSI (241.32 kPa)

(iii) Hot Water Spray (three options, denoted by a, b, and c)
Time: 15-45s
Temperature: (a) 65.5°C, (b) 71°C, (c) 82.2°C
Pressure Delivery: 35 PSI (241.32 kPa)

(iv) Hot air (three options, denoted by a, b, c)
Time: 15-90s
Temperature: (a) 454.4°C, (b) 482.2°C, (c) 510°C
 
Optimum exposure times for the combination treatments were water (120 s) and lactic acid (75 s)

Combination iii  reduced aerobic bacteria to the greatest extent

All treatments except water reduced coliforms and E. coli to below detectable levels by day 7
Eggenberger-Solorzano, L., S. Niebuhr, G. Acuff, and J. Dickson. 2002. Hot water and organic acid interventions to control microbiological contamination on hog carcasses during processing. Journal of Food Protection 65: 1248-1252.  Hot Carcass Pork Aerobic Plate Counts (APC)
Enterobacteriaceae
Escherichia coli (Generic)
(i) Hot water wash
(ii) Acetic acid spray
(iiI) Water wash + acetic acid spray
Bactericidal (i) Hot Water Wash
Time: 5s
Temperature: 82.2°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: 25 PSI (172.37 kPa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Wash
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Hot Carcass Pieces (to simulate whole hot carcass)

(ii) Acetic Acid Spray
Time: 3s
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 1.8%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Commercial acid rinse cabinet
Pressure Delivery: <25 PSI (166 kPa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Hot Carcass Pieces (to simulate whole hot carcass)
(i) Hot Water Wash
Time: 5s
Temperature: 82.2°C
Pressure Delivery: 25 PSI (172.37 kPa)

(ii) Acetic Acid Spray
Time: 3s
Concentration: 1.8%
Equipment Settings: Commercial acid rinse cabinet
Pressure Delivery: <25 PSI (166 kPa)
The hot water wash followed by the acetic acid spray significantly reduced the microbial populations on both scalded and skinned pork carcasses

The combined hot water and acetic acid spray reduced the populations of  APC, coliforms, and E. coli, however, there were no differences between the hot water wash and the hot water wash and acetic acid spray
DeGeer, S., L. Wang, G. Hill, M. Singh, S. Bilgili, and C. Bratcher. 2016. Optimizing application parameters for lactic acid and sodium metasilicate against pathogens on fresh beef, pork and deli meats. Meat Science 118: 28-33. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.008 Retail Cut Pork Escherichia coli (Generic)
Salmonella spp.
(i) Lactic Acid
(ii) Sodium metasilicate
Bactericidal (i) Lactic Acid Dip
Time: NE
Temperature: 4, 25, 60°C
Concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal

(ii) Sodium Metasilicate Dip
Time: NE
Temperature: 4, 25, 60°C
Concentration: 2, 3, 4, 5%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal
(i) Lactic Acid Dip
Temperature: 4, 25, 60°C
Concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4%

(ii) Sodium Metasilicate Dip
Temperature: 4, 25, 60°C
Concentration: 2, 3, 4, 5%
Sodium metasilicate and lactic acid at 4% were effective against E. coli O157:H7, non-O157 STEC, and Salmonella
Fabrizio, K., and C. Cutter. 2004. Comparison of electrolyzed oxidizing water with other antimicrobial interventions to reduce pathogens on fresh pork. Meat Science 68: 463-468. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.013 Subprimal Pork Listeria monocytogenes
Salmonella Typhimurium
Campylobacter coli
(i) Chlorinated Water Spray
(ii) Lactic Acid (2%) Spray
(III) Acidic Electrolyzed Oxidizing (EO) Water
Bactericidal (i) Chlorinated Water Spray
Time: 15s
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 25 ppm
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Hand-held, garden sprayer
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal

(ii) Lactic Acid Spray
Time: 15s
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 2%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Hand-held, garden sprayer
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal

(iii) Acidic Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water
Time: 15s
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 50 ppm free chlorine, 1150 mV ORP
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: Hand-held, garden sprayer
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal
(i) Chlorinated Water Spray
Time: 15s
Concentration: 25 ppm

(ii) Lactic Acid Spray
Time: 15s
Concentration: 2%

(iii) Acidic Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water
Time: 15s
Concentration: 50 ppm free chlorine, 1150 mV ORP
Lactic acid and Acidic EO water significantly reduced populations of Campylobacter coli at days 0 and 7
Piachin, T., and N. Trachoo. 2011. Effect of ozone and potassium on lipid oxidation and survival of Salmonella typhimurium on fresh pork. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 14: 236-240.  Subprimal Pork Salmonella Typhimurium (i) Ozone Gas
(ii) Potassium Lactate
Bactericidal (i) Ozone Gas
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: NE
Volume: 0, 200, 500, 1,00 mg h-1
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Gas
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal

(ii) Potassium Lactate
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 2, 4%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): NE
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal
(i) Ozone Gas
Volume: 0, 200, 500, 1,00 mg h-1

(ii) Potassium Lactate
Concentration: 2, 4%
4% potassium lactate inhibited Salmonella typhimurium.

At 1,000 mg h-1, ozone improved the inhinibtory effect of potassium lactate on Salmonella typhimurium
King, A., R. Miller, A. Castillo, D. Griffin, and M. Hardin. 2012. Effects of Lactic Acid and Commercial Chilling Processes on Survival of Salmonella, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Campylobacter coli in Pork Variety Meats. Journal of Food Protection 75: 1589-1594. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-004 Variety Meats Pork Salmonella
Yersinia enterocolitica
Campylobacter coli
(i) Lactic Acid Bactericidal (i) Lactic Acid Spray
Time: NE
Temperature: 40-50°C
Concentration: 2%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Variet Meats
(i) Lactic Acid Spray
Temperature: 40-50°C
Concentration: 2%
Lactic acid combined with good manufacturing practices causes reductions of Salmonella, Y. enterocolitica, and C. coli
Mansur, A., C. Tango, G. Kim, and D. Oh. 2015. Combined effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and fumaric acid on the reduction of foodborne pathogens and shelf life extension of fresh pork. Food Control 47: 277-284. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.07.019 Subprimals Pork Escherichia coli (Generic)
Listeria monocytogenes
Staphylococcus aureus
Salmonella Typhimurium
(i) Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water
(ii) Strong Acidic Electrolyzed Water
(iiI) Fumaric Acid
(iv) Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water and Fumaric Acid
Bactericidal (i) Slightly Acid Electrolyzed Water Dip
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 6% HCl solution
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal

(ii) Strong Acidic Electrolyzed Water
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 9% HCl
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal


(iii) Fumaric Acid
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 0.5%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal
(i) Slightly Acid Electrolyzed Water Dip
Concentration: 6% HCl solution

(ii) Strong Acidic Electrolyzed Water
Concentration: 9% HCl

(iii) Fumaric Acid
Concentration: 0.5%
The combination of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and 0.5% fumaric acid at 40°C for 3 min showed the greatest reduction of E.  Coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, and S. Typhimurium
Castelo, M., M. Koohmaraie, and E. Berry. 2001. Microbial and quality attributes of ground pork prepared from commercial pork trim treated with combination intervention processes. Journal of Food Protection 64: 1981-1987.  Trimmings Pork APC
Coliforms
Escherichia coli (Generic)
Lactic acid bacteria
(i) Water (15°C, 120s)
(ii) water (15°C, 120s) followed by lactic acid (2%) wash
(iii) water (15°C, 120s) followed by lactic acid (2%) followed by hot air (510°C, 90s)
(iv) hot air (510°C, 90s) followed by water (15°C, 120s) followed by hot air (510°C, 90s)
Bactericidal (i) Water Wash
Time: 120 s
Temperature: 15°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: 65 PSI (448.16 kPa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Wash
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Trim

(ii) Lactic Acid Spray
Time: 75 s
Temperature: 15°C
Concentration: 2%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: 35 PSI (241.32 kPa)
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Trim


(iii) Fumaric Acid
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 0.5%
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Dip
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Subprimal

(iii) Hot Air
Time: 90 s
Temperature: 510°C
Concentration: NE
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: In-line hot air cabinet
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): NE
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Trim
(i) Water Wash
Time: 120 s
Temperature: 15°C
Pressure Delivery: 65 PSI (448.16 kPa)

(ii) Lactic Acid Spray
Time: 75 s
Temperature: 15°C
Concentration: 2%
Pressure Delivery: 35 PSI (241.32 kPa)

(iii) Hot Air
Time: 90 s
Temperature: 510°C
All intervention treatments significantly reduced microbial populations in ground pork

Water followed by lactic acid and water followed by lactic acid followed by hot air were the most effective in reducing aerobic bacteria and E. coli
Garcia-Marques, I., J. A. Ordonez, M. I. Cambero, and M. C. Cabeza. 2012. Use of E-beam for shelf-life extension and sanitizing of marinated pork loin. International Journal of Microbiology.  Marinated Subprimal Pork
Lactic acid bacteria
Enterobacteriaceae
Pseudomonas
Listeria spp.
Escherichia coli (Generic)*
Salmonella spp.*

*Listeria was used as an indicator for Salmonella and E. coli
In regards to E-beam radiation, Salmonella has a similar resistance to Listeria, and E. coli has a lower resistance than Listeria
E-beam radiation Bactericidal (i) E-beam Radiation
Time: NE
Temperature: NE
Concentration: 0.2, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 kGy
Volume: NE
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): NE
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): Marinated Subprimal
(i) E-beam Radiation
Concentration: 0.2, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 kGy
Initial LAB counts were reduced by the E-beam and the D-value was determined to be 0.85 kGy

Differences in pseudomonads were unable to be recorded

Enterobacteriaceae was practically eliminated by the treatment

A D-value of 0.46 was calculated for Listeria
Prasai, R., G. Acuff, L. Lucia, J. Morgan, S. May, and J. Savell. 1992. Microbiological effects of acid decontamination of pork carcasses at various locations in processing. Meat Sci. 32:413-423. Hot Carcass Pork Aerobic Plate Counts (APC)
Salmonella
Listeria
Lactic Acid Spray Bactericidal Time: NE
Temperature: 55°C
Concentration: 1%
Volume: 225 mL per carcass for before evisceration, 225 mL per carcass side for post-evisceration
Equipment Settings: NE
Pressure Delivery: NE
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray
Point of Application (hot cx, cold cx, subprimal, trim): hot carcass
(i) Before evisceration, after dehairing (no singing)
(ii) Post-evisceration
(iii) Both before evisceration and post-evisceration
Other: pH 2.8
Temperature: 55°C
Concentration: 1%
Volume: 225 mL per carcass for before evisceration, 225 mL per carcass side for post-evisceration
Treatment Application Type (spray/wash): Spray

Other: pH 2.8
No Salmonella and Listeria were observed during this experiment

There was a numerical reduction in APC in a 0-h sample and 48-h sample of carcass surfaces, but they were not statistically significant.

Samples taken at 48-h had numerically lower counts than the samples taken at 0-h, but not statistically.


Some internal links within this document are funded and maintained by the Beef Checkoff. All other outgoing links are to websites maintained by third parties.